Inovasi Kaedah Pembelajaran: Perkembangan Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Institusi Pendidikan

The Evolution of Technology use in Education Institutions: Learning Method Innovation

  • Mohd Khairulnizam Ramlie Kolej Pengajian Seni Kreatif, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, Kampus Seri Iskandar, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Ashraf Abdul Rahaman Kolej Pengajian Seni Kreatif, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, Kampus Seri Iskandar, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad Kolej Pengajian Seni Kreatif, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, Kampus Seri Iskandar, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Abdullah Kolej Pengajian Seni Kreatif, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, Kampus Seri Iskandar, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

Abstract

Pembangunan bahan multimedia terus disokong oleh evolusi alat teknologi yang pesat, terutamanya dalam penyediaan bahan multimedia. Bahan multimedia mula digunakan di dalam sistem pendidikan berikutan kelebihan yang ditawarkan dalam meningkatkan motivasi dan emosi dalam pembelajaran pelajar. Setiap revolusi yang dialami oleh bidang pendidikan dilihat seiring dengan perkembangan alat teknologi. Oleh itu, institusi pendidikan perlu lebih berdaya saing dalam penggunaan alat teknologi untuk menghasilkan pelajar dan graduan yang berkualiti. Revolusi pendidikan juga dilihat seiring dengan penggunaan alat teknologi dan penyediaan bahan multimedia. Walau bagaimanapun, penggunaan alat teknologi dalam pendidikan perlu melalui proses-proses tertentu bagi menjamin keberkesanan dan kebolehgunaannya. Penggunaan alat teknologi yang tidak melalui proses penyelidikan dan diuji secara teliti berpotensi untuk mempengaruhi emosi dalam pembelajaran pelajar. Secara khususnya, bagi menjalankan kajian teknologi dalam pendidikan, penyelidik perlu lebih memahami mengenai perkembangan industri pendidikan. Kajian ini menerokai perkara dasar revolusi pendidikan yang berlaku sejak era pendidikan 1.0 hingga era pendidikan 4.0 secara umum. 


 Kata Kunci: Teknologi Pendidikan, Revolusi Pendidikan, Emosi Dalam Pembelajaran, Bahan Multimedia, Alat Teknologi. 


 


ABSTRACT  


The rapid evolution of technological tools, particularly in the provision of multimedia materials, has continued to support the development of multimedia materials. Because of the benefits offered in increasing motivation and emotions in student learning, multimedia materials began to be used in the education system. Every educational revolution has coincided with the advancement of technological tools. As a result, educational institutions must become more competitive in their use of technology tools in order to produce quality students and graduates. The education revolution is also seen in tandem with the use of technology tools and the provision of multimedia materials. However, the use of technology tools in education must go through certain processes to ensure their effectiveness and usability. The use of technological tools that have not been thoroughly tested and have not gone through the research process has the potential to affect emotions in student learning. In particular, in order to conduct research on technology in education, researchers must first understand the evolution of the education industry. This study investigates the fundamentals of the education revolution that occurred from the era of education 1.0 to the era of education 4.0 in general. 


  


Keywords: Education Technology, Education Revolution, Emotions in Learning, Multimedia Materials, Technology Tools. 

References

Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2007). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9054-9

Acilar, A. (2011). Exploring the aspects of digital divide in a developing country. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.28945/1415

Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A. (2018). Multimedia dan Perisian Pendidikan: Panduan Praktikal Reka Bentuk dan Penyelidikan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Awad, A. H., & Kharbat, F. F. (2018). The first design of a smart hologram for teaching. 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). https://doi.org/10.1109/icaset.2018.8376931

Barkhaya, N. M., & Abd Halim, N. D. (2016). A review of application of 3D Hologram in Education: A meta-analysis. 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED). https://doi.org/10.1109/iceed.2016.7856083

Buckenmeyer, J. A. (2010). Beyond computers in the classroom: Factors related to technology adoption to enhance teaching and learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(4), 27. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i4.194

Demartini, C., & Benussi, L. (2017). Do web 4.0 and Industry 4.0 imply education X.0? IT Professional, 19(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2017.47

Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J.-A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of Virtual Laboratory and practical work: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 135, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010

Fisk, P. (2017, January 25). Education 4.0 ... the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Peter Fisk. Retrieved January 31, 2023, from https://www.peterfisk.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/

Gerstein, J. (2014). Moving from Education 1.0 Through Education 2.0 Towards Education 3.0. Educational Technology Faculty Publications And Presentations.

Ghuloum, H. (2010). 3D hologram technology in learning environment. InSITE Conference, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.28945/1283

Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.009

Jelfs, A., & Richardson, J. T. (2012). The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01308.x

Johal, W., Castellano, G., Tanaka, F., & Okita, S. (2018). Robots for learning. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 293–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0481-8

Kalolo, J. F. (2018). Digital Revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3

Kurup, V., & Hersey, D. (2013). The changing landscape of anesthesia education. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 26(6), 726–731. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000004

Mailizar, M., & Fan, L. (2019). Indonesian teachers’ knowledge of ICT and the use of ICT in secondary mathematics teaching. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110352

McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a Digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856

McWilliam, E. (2009). Teaching for creativity: From sage to guide to Meddler. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790903092787

Oztekin, A., Delen, D., Turkyilmaz, A., & Zaim, S. (2013). A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning Systems. Decision Support Systems, 56, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.003

Paredes, S. G., & Vazquez, N. R. (2019). My teacher is a hologram: Measuring innovative stem learning experiences. 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/isecon.2019.8882042

Ramachandiran, C. R., Chong, M. M., & Subramanian, P. (2019). 3D hologram in Futuristic Classroom: A Review. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 7(2), 580. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i2.441

Ramlie, M. K., Mohamad Ali, A. Z., & Rokeman, M. I. (2020). Design approach of Hologram tutor: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1336

Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4593
Simarmata, J., Nasution, M. D. T. P., Manurung, R. T., Lubis, M. A., Kurniasih, N., Purnomo, A., Anam, F., Nisa, K.,
Siahaan, A. P. U., & Rahim, R. (2018). Prototype Application Multimedia Learning for Teaching Basic English . International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2), 264–266.

Tan, S. Y., Al-Jumeily, D., Mustafina, J., Hussain, A., Broderick, A., & Forsyth, H. (2018). Rethinking our education to face the new industry era. EDULEARN Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.1564

Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2011). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x

Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters – the impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417
Published
2023-04-01
How to Cite
RAMLIE, Mohd Khairulnizam et al. Inovasi Kaedah Pembelajaran: Perkembangan Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Institusi Pendidikan. Idealogy Journal, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 1, apr. 2023. ISSN 2550-214X. Available at: <http://www.idealogyjournal.com/ojs/index.php/idealogy/article/view/407>. Date accessed: 18 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v8i1.407.